LatestBriefings
NJ · MediumNew Jersey holds October 15 hearings on a tighter power plant carbon cap from…PA · MediumPennsylvania requires proof of a water supplier before towns give final appro…PA · MediumPennsylvania board to consider stricter protection for 16 stream basins on Oc…NY · MediumNew York court blocks commercial tax class for vacant residential lots outsid…NJ · LowDelaware River basin proposal would make New Jersey water suppliers report th…NY · MediumNew York high court upholds SoHo and NoHo conversion fee; Supreme Court confe…NY · HighNew York City adopts fast-track land-use review and housing appeals board rul…PA · HighFederal: Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and central Pennsylvania counties may face…NY · MediumNew York appeals court holds brownfield cleanup kept Buffalo scrap yard's gra…NJ · LowNew Jersey Meadowlands authority sets October 20 hearing on changes to Kearny…
MediumNew Jersey

New Jersey appeals court upholds Pinelands limits on aquifer water diversions; ruling not approved for publication

On July 15, 2026 the Appellate Division affirmed the Pinelands Commission's amendments to its water management rule, which set a 50,000 gallon-per-day diversion threshold. The opinion is not for publication, and Commission staff have asked that it be published. A data center application in Monroe Township is also before the Commission.

On July 15, 2026, the Superior Court, Appellate Division, decided In re Challenge of Clayton Sand Company to December 4, 2023 Amendments to N.J.A.C. 7:50-1.1 et seq., Docket No. A-1476-23, affirming the Pinelands Commission's amendments to the Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan water management provisions, including N.J.A.C. 7:50-6.86(d)2. The opinion is marked not for publication without the approval of the Appellate Division and states that it shall not constitute precedent or be binding upon any court. The Commission's August 2026 management report says staff asked the Division of Law to request publication, which would make the decision precedential, and that publication had not been approved as of that report.

In re Challenge of Clayton Sand Co., No. A-1476-23 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. July 15, 2026) (unpublished); N.J.A.C. 7:50-6.86(d)2

More on New Jersey: rulebook · compliance calendar · funding and incentives · open comment periods